It has been accompanied by crises and
disasters since the human being found on
this land and deal with it, according to its
possibilities available to the effects of the
effects or only the role of spectators, when
the crisis exceeded its capabilities and
limited potential. Many human and natural
disasters, such as earthquakes, floods,
hurricanes, epidemics and famine, And the
peoples, for example, say: the year of
earthquakes, or the year of plague, and there
is no nation in the face of disasters or crises,
which if survived for a period of time, but
they remain under a volcano of crises do not
know when to revolt.
In fact, there are crises that can be controlled
and contained, but they have ended as
security crises that are difficult to predict,
and if there is a prophecy that can not be
easily explained and interpreted, it is
difficult to address, and if it is difficult to get
rid of its effects. The researchers did not pay
attention to the importance of this to the
knowledge of crisis management in modern
times due to the multiplicity of crises on the
one hand and the high voices calling for
what should be taken towards sudden events
to avoid its destructive effects, but towards
this new field.
The early interest of this science by policy
makers is also weakened by the fact that it is
a hypothetical phenomenon that is not
necessarily certain. Where will it be? They
face difficulties in predicting their size and
destructive dimensions. In addition, they
face the politically acceptable risk of
assuming optimism that the catastrophe will
not happen in the foreseeable future to avoid
setting up financial funds to prepare and
prepare to avoid their dangers. The programs
related to disaster prevention have been of
low priority among politicians, To allocate
the available resources to solve the most
pressing immediate problems.) This risk of
embracing the optimistic assumption that the
disaster is far from occurring in the near
future explains to us the lack of legislation
concerning you Legacy in normal
circumstances, and their reproduction in
Kperfi period following the disaster directly
where the risks resulting from it become
pressing issues together top policy priorities
for the public.
In the modern era, it is no longer surprising
that the orientations of the nations in their
movement will be influenced by a new
philosophy that has become so common that
the unknown will calculate as much as it can
calculate, and that the contingency and
opposition will be calculated as much as
possible for the stable and the firm. Its plans
and policy on the variables and indicators
stable and few of them only allow in their
plans and policies to a degree of dealing
2
together variables and indicators stable and
few of them is only allows in its plans and
policies to a degree of dealing with the
variants of the semi-unknown and proved
beyond any doubt that the communities T
give in dealing a place of unknown, a few
communities in number, are gaining
sovereignty and superiority over most of the
communities in which its policy is not in
place, except for a known and clear.
There is a growing interest in crisis
management as a method for the future and
adaptation to sudden and unpredictable
changes, and it is certain that dealing with
any crisis does not take place when it
happens to be in the field of actual response
but it is through the pre-visualization and
early preparation for the crisis. Is a turning
point in the life of the individual,
organization or society and often results in a
major change. This is where crisis
management comes to play a major role in
the crisis and reduce its aggravation so that it
does not escape. Thus, the rational
management of the crisis is the preservation
and protection of the vital interests of the
Organization.
The present study focuses on the methods of
managing crises and emergencies in public
hospitals within the scope of western Libya
is the same sample of the current study of (3)

hospitals: Al-Zawia Educational Hospital,
Tripoli Medical Center and Gemayel
Hospital